This is Translation from The original article is in Urdu is From Majaalis of
Moulana Muhammed Ameen Safdar Ukaarwi'. He is a well known Hanafi Aalim from
Pakistan. This
translation is a part of Urdu article available on the official website of
Darul Uloom Deoband (India) on this link http://darululoom-deoband.com/urdu/current/fazail1.htm. This link also has an scholary
discussion on related issue. Again I
will request that for the sake of Allah forget about everything else. Rather
see issues discussed here. It is not necessary that you be agree each line and
words of the article. But certainly this article has touched the key issues.
And any sensible and Rational Muslim can gain much from it about the whole issue.
A Talk between an Islamic Scholar and a Muslim Brother
who was made confused against the blessed work of Dawat o Tabligh being done by Tablighi Jamaat. Alhamdulillah at the end the brother understood the truth and realised that how a trap and propaganda is being unleashed to confuse Muslims.May Allah help the Ummah
The Translation of Discussion Starts……….
During my journey to Karachi I met one person; he
was telling his name as Mirza Waheed Beig. He was actually from Punjab
(Pakistan) but had been settled in America for a long time.
He told his story like this,
"After completing my degree F.A, I went to
America. For One year I remained in this condition, that I read only the salaat
of the two Eids and a few others. At one of the Eid salaats I met
two three Brothers who were connected to the tableeghi jamaat. They took my address down and kept
contact with me.
A
Change in life
There way manner (Surat o Seerat) was in
accordance with the Shariah of Muhammed Sallallahu Alaihi wasallam . Just by being
in their company I also realized about an Islaamic lifestyle. I started going in Tablighi jamaat and found a strange peace of mind
and heart coming over me. Alhamdullilaah I became punctual on salaat
(Namaz) and Roza (Saum). I started having more regard for halaal and
haraam. I spared some of my time and wealth to learn and spread Deen. I made
effort on my wife, children and friends, creating a tranquil environment of
Deen. Four years of my life was spent in this manner. My wife and I completed
all our qadhaa salaat. We decided to spend our lives in repentance and
regret, asking from ulema the religious issues,trying to fulfill whatever
shortcomings we might have had In huququlllaah (rights of Allaah) and huququl
ibaad (rights of man) .I purchased the books 'Fazaail e A'amaal', 'Ta'aleemul
Islaam' and 'Behashti Zewar' was trying my best to practice
according to Islamic Life style.
A
new Turn
After
four years on one eid, two or three youngsters came and surrounded me.
They greeted me with a lot of eagerness, praising my efforts and enthusiasm for
Deen. Even though they had no
Shar'ie beard, and Islaamic dress. But they used to speak of Deen with such
fervor and passion that I was impressed by them. I started to spend more time
with them with this intention that with their fervor it will be easy to guide
them to the Shar'ie manner, dressing and Islamic way of life.
I went to them; they had a library of Islamic
books. They said to me "Your Deen
has come from India and ours has come from Makkah and Madinah. Saying this
they gave me one book entitled 'Salaatur Rasul' by Moulana Saadiq Seeyaalqoti.
They told me "if you want to follow the Deen of Makkah and Madinah read
this kitaab", I took the kitaab saying "This is from Seeyaalqot not
Makkah or Madinah." They replied "Even though it was written in
Seeyaalkot it has the content of Makkah and Madinah"
First
difference
I
informed them, "Hadhrat Sheikhul Hadeeth
Rahimullah has also written a book with aayaat of Quran, Hadeeth and
stories of the pious, and it is a brilliant kitaab. My life has changed because of this kitaab, I
never perfomled salaat now I do, I spoken lies now I have repented , I had no
regard for halaal and haraam now I make every effort to stay away from haraam,
my life and the way I look is now IsIaamic because of this kitaab."
Immediately
they cut me off, "You are an educated man, Sheikhul Hadeeth Sahib has
narrated many things with no reference." They then showed me many places
where no reference was given. Pointing to 'Salaatur Rasul' they said "See
every statement has reference, Deen should always be with reference and should
be reliable not the opposite."
I had no reply to give them, and I really felt
bothered as to why Hadhrat Sheikhul Hadeeth did not give any references."
After saying all of this, he asked me to reply.
I (Moulana Ukaarwi) replied,"
'Hadhrat SheikhuI Hadeeth himself has given reply
to this; he says "at this point it is imperative to make you aware of a
very important point; I have relied extensively on -Mishkaat', 'Tankeehur
Ruwaat', 'Mirqaat', the Sharah-commentary- of 'Ihya-ul-Uloom' and 'Targheeb wa
Tarheeb' of Munthari, and have narrated mostly from them. That is why I thought
it not necessary to give reference, however any narration taken from elsewhere
has been narrated with reference." (Fazaail Quraan p7)
He read this paragraph three times and then said,
"Hadhrat has indeed made it clear
but I did not read it properly."
I then said to him, '''Salaatur Rasul' has also
narrated many things without any reference, the athkaar-statcments- and a'amaal
mentioned from page 449 to page 454 all have no reference. Moulana Abdur
Ra'oof, ghair muqallid, in the sub-notes of 'Salaatur Rasul' has made fun of
practicing on the aayat in this way,
"Is it not better, to take the one who wants
to practice on this aayat, lock him in a box and throw him in the sea'? Not
only will he create the setting of Hadhrat Younis A.S but will put him in the
same frame of mind. The one who will do this would not have to stay trapped for
forty-one days but after a few hours with the grace of Allaah all the clouds of
sadness and depression will be removed. No form of difficulty or problem will
remain; rather he will have ever lasting protection from all forms of worry and
anxiety. 'To AlIaah do we belong and to Him will we return'. I am completely
astounded and distressed at the same time, that these types of deceptive and
futile activities have penetrated the ranks of us 'Salafiyeen'. May Allaah be
your judge, is this not equivalent to mocking the exalted position of AlIaah
Ta'ala? From which aayat or hadeeth has this practice been deduced? (Sub notes
of' Salaatur Rasul' p504)
Incorrect
reference
He was astonished to see how many aspects were
mentioned without any reference, and this statement made regarding it. I then
said to him "Many of the references that were given are incorrect as well,
in 'Salaatur Rasul' (pI36) under the 'Unrivaled advantages of salaat' he has
narrated twenty four ahaadeeth with reference to 'Sihaah Sittah', whereas no
sign of fourteen of them, (1, 5, 6, 7, 8. 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 20)
can be found in 'Sihaah Sittah' ."
This has been written by Moulana Abdur Raoaf
himself,
"Some ahaadeeth are also such, that it cannot
be found in those books that were given as reference, eg pages 278,283,311,343,358,571,639,665,667,677,509,
620. (Sub notes of 'Salaatur Rasul' p 14)
These are twelve ahaadeeth which have been quoted
with incorrect references; this makes it twenty-six incorrect references. I
then said to him "In this little book how many incorrect references were
given." Now Mirza Waheed Beig was drowned in bewilderment, he was saying
repeatedly "Oh Allaah! Where must the simple heart of your servant go?”
Dhaeef
Ahaadeeth (Weak Ahadith)
Janaab Waheed Sahib then said "They lold me
Sheikhul Hadeeth has written mostly without any reference, where references
were given they are dhaeef, lies and fabrications whereas in 'Salaatur Rasul'
there is not even one dhaeef hadeeth. Waheed Beig said “this allegation against
'Fazaail e A'amaal' was very burdensome, which totally turned me off 'Fazaail Aamaal'.
I replied to him, 'This presumption of theirs is
contrary to the accepted principle of all Muhaditheen. For according to Muhaditheen (Hadith Scholars) dhaeef ahaadeeth are
accepted in virtues of action (fazaaiI aamaal) and encouragement (targheeb wa
tarheeb,) Hadhrat Sheikh himself explained this principal. At the end of
'FazaaiI Namaaz', Hadhrat last words were,
"It
is necessary to point out, that according to Muhaditheen (May Allaah be pleased
with all of them) in the narrations of virtues (fazaail) there is
broadmindedness and a little dhaeefness is tolerated. As far as the stories of
Sufiyaa Kiraam go, these are historical accounts which have a much lesser rank
then that of hadeeth." (Fazaail
Namaaz' p96)
In another
place,
"Even
though there is criticism on it in being from hadeeth but this is not any fiqhi
mas'ala which needs to be substantiated or proven, rather they are glad-tidings
and dreams." ('Fazaail Durood p56)
I said to
him, "Let me give you a brief explanation", just as the basis of all calculation is on two things, addition
and subtraction, likewise, in determining the status of a hadeeth two thing are
considered, memory and integrity. He must have a good memory and is pious
not sinful. If the narrators memory is poor then Muhaditheen categorize it as
'Dhaeef qareeb' as its dhaeefness is removed by corroborating it with other
narrations. In the Quran Allaah Ta'ala has made the testimony of two women
equal to one man, the reason given is that if one of them were to forget then
the other will remind her. Based on this Muhaditheen have created this
principal, that if one hadeeth has two chains and the narrator in one chain has
a dhaeef memory then after joining the two chains the hadeeth will be accepted
as sahee. That is why Hadhrat Sheikhul
Hadeeth in numerous places has written "This subject has come in many
narrations"; to make it known that because of corroborating narrations
this hadeeth is accepted. So now to reject such a narration is to reject a
principal of the Quraan, so the objection should not be made on Hadhrat Sheikh but
rather on the Quraan.
If the narrator is not pious then the
hadeeth is categorized as 'Dhaeef
shadeed'. Therefore it cannot be used as proof in ahkaam but in virtues (fazaail)
and history piety is not a condition. Nabi
sallallahu Alaihi wasallam has said "Narrate from the Bani Israeel,
it is no problem." ('Bukhaari shareef vol 1 p491, 'Tirmidhi' vol 2 pl07)
.So in targheeb wa tarheeb to narrate even from a kaafir is no problem, is this
non-pious even worse then a yahoodi? This can never be. Here also if is
narrated from various chains then to relate it is no problem. Yes such
narrations are not accepted in ahkaam (Ruling of jurisprudence). This
makes it known that those narrations which Hadhrat sheikh has used are in
direct accordance with the principal of the Quraan, Hadeeth and Muhaditheen.
All Muhaditheen have followed this practice in fazaail. Imaam Nawawi Rahimullah in the introduction to 'Sharah Muslim' (vol
p21) and Sheikhul Islaam Ibn Taimiyyah Rahimullah in his fatawa have plainly
stated that dhaeef ahaadccth are accepted in Fazaail.
The other hand
I said to
him, "You will be astonished to know that in 'Salaatur Rasul' not only
numerous dhaeef ahaadeeth are used in fazaail but in Ruling (ahkaam) as
well. Moulana Abdur Raoof has pointed out 84 ahaadecth which are extremely
dhaeef; 6, 13, 14,22,34,52,53,56,66, 73, 75, 88, 107, 109, 110, 153, 159, 160,
161, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 172, 173,204,205,206,209,214,224,226,231,233,234,236,239,241,248,249,
265,266,278,363,383,414,415,419,444,448,459,
461,470,472,473,485,541,544,545,551,557,565,
578,584,586,626,630,654,660,664,665,666,673, 679,683,694,695,699,703.
All of these ahaadeeth are extremely dhaeef this is
an example of advising others and forgetting oneself. After hearing this Janaab
Waheed Sahib was extremely distressed. ''The teeth with which an elephant eats
and those he shows are different"
Filled
with Shirk
They told me (Waheed sahib) that ''Fazail e Amaal
is filled with shirk. 'Fazaail Sadaqaat', 'Fazaail Durood' and 'Fazaail
Hajj' all contain stories which encourage shirk. For a number of days I was
distressed, this book has been distributed all over the world, not thousands
but millions of people' s lives have changed because of this book, multitudes
of Ulama have seen this book but the minds of not even one Mufti, Muhaddith or
Faqeeh has reached where these youngsters have. I had no explanation for any of
this. I not only left the tableeghi jamaat but also opposed it. As according to
my knowledge these people were missionaries of shirk and their salaat was also
entirely wrong. Now according to me even greater than salaat,(Namaz)
roza, hajj and jihad there was no greater deed than opposing the tableeghi
jamaat. At home, at work, in the markets, in private gatherings and in the
Masjids my call was "This is not a jamaat of tauheed but of shirk." I
had no more enthusiasm to read salaat with jamaat or takbeer e oowla and the
regard for halaal or haraam was no longer there. This is the height of tauheed
and sunnat after which all sins are forgiven. I was no longer as punctual on
salaat as I used to be but developed a taste for calling others mushrik. I no
longer had any concern for my own self reformation as to free the world from
shirk comes first, those who had become mushrik from reading 'Fazaail A'amaal.
Although I was not succeeding in this world, as in two years of continuous
effort I only managed to turn two teenagers away from tableegh whereas
thousands more had joined with this jamaat, nevertheless I had complete faith
in receiving my complete reward in the hereafter.
Miracles
of Aulia Allah
I replied, 'Those stories to which you are
referring are called 'karaamaat' or also referred to as acts contrary to the
order of nature. For example, the order of nature is that a child is conceived
with the union of man and women but against the order of nature Hadhrat Miryam Alaihissalam
gave birth to a boy without being touched by a man.The order of nature is that
a camel is born from another camel and against the order of nature a camel is
born from a mountain. The order of nature is that a snake comes from an egg and
against the order of nature the stick of Hadhrat Moosa Alaihissalam
turns into a snake. The order of nature is such that through medication or an
operation blindness is cured and against the order of nature with the shirt of
Hadhrat Yusuf Alaihissalam or the touch of Hadhrat Isa Alaihissalam ones
eyesight was restored. The order of nature is that camels make noises like
other camels or wolves the same as other wolves and against the order of nature
they begin talking like human beings. In those acts which are in accordance
with nature, man has some form of choice but the choice of those acts against
the order of nature is only with Allaah Ta'ala, it only becomes apparent with
creation.
Look in the Quraan, the miracles of Hadhrat Isa Alaihissalam
are mentioned. All Muslims take these miracles to be true and believe that it
happened with the gesture of Hadhrat Isa Alaihissalam but was a sign of
Allaah's power and majesty. When Muslims believe in the power and majesty of
Allaah Ta'ala then every miracle is seen as a proof of tauheed. Christians take
these miracles to be the action of Hadhrat Isa Alaihissalam and believe they happened by his choice so
they have made all these miracles a proof of shirk. Using these miracles as a
proof of shirk was not a fault of Hadhrat lsa Alaihissalam (Nauzubillah);
but rather the fault of those Christians who turned a proof of tauheed into a
proof or shirk. In the same manner, we the Ahle Sunnah wal lama'ah
whenever we learn of any miracle we take it be a sign of Allaah's power and
majesty. That is why in karaamaat I see
only and only tauheed whereas when you all read 'Fazail e Amaal' with a
Christian mind-set, you all see those karaamaat as shirk. Neither is it any
fault of Aulia Allah that Allah has used these pious saints as a means to makes
His majesty apparent rather it is this Christian mind-set. If you repent
from this Christian mind-set and read with an Islaamic mindset then you will
also see tauheed and only tauheed.
This
is impossible
This made Waheed Sahib extremely angry that there
are such things in some of these stories that are completely impossible and can
never happen. I replied to him "From
who is it impossible? From the Creator or the creation? If you say it is
impossible for the creation then you are right but to regard it as an act of
creation is a Christian mind-set and if you say it is impossible from the
Creator then this is to deny the knowledge and power of Allaah Ta'ala. If you
do deny it and take the power of the Creator as equal to yours, that what you
cannot do the Creator cannot do either, then refresh your tauheed and repent.
this is not denying the miracles of pious Aulia Allah but denying the power of
Allaah Ta'ala.
All
Lies
Waheed Beig
then said, "Regarding these Aulia Allah people invent many tales.
What reliance can be placed on them? I replied, "Where has not lies been invented? People have invented false
gods and prophets, ahaadeeth have been fabricated and counterfeit money has
been made. Now will the false gods only
be denied or the true god as well? Will the false prophets only be denied
or the true prophets as well? Will the fabricated ahaadeeth only be denied or
the true ahaadeeth as well? Will "only the counterfeit money be discarded
or the genuine money as well? Who has asked you to accept the false stories?
Why do you deny the true stories as well?
Inconceivable
Waheed Sahib said "How can one accept these
stories? There are such acts mentioned that were not even done by the Ambiyaa
Alaihissalam nor Sahabah Raziallahu Anhu. The rank of a Nabi or Companion (Sahabi)
is far greater than that of a wali and it is impossible that an act contrary to
nature has not become apparent for any Sahabi or Nabi but it becomes apparent
for a wali" I replied "This is
indeed strange, where qiyaas is permissible you say it is shirk yet in acts
contrary to nature you have begun to make qiyaas. I ask you, do you have
dreams or not?" He replied "yes, I do" I asked "Is it the
same as those seen by the Arnbiyaa and Sahabah or different?" He replied
"For what is the Sahabah and Ambiyaa being mentioned here? Whatever dream
Allaah wants whichever person to see Allaah lets him see it." I said
"Sometimes a small child has a dream then he says ''Today I had a dream
that grandfather came to visit" and the grandfather actually does come to
visit proving the dream to be true. Yet no one from the household denies it
saying, none of the elders have seen this dream. So how can we accept that a mere
child has had this dream. Look Hadhrat Maryam Alaihissalam is a Walliyah
yet she is receiving out of season fruits and Hadhrat Zakariyya Alaihissalam
who is a Nabi is not getting. Even though Hadhrat Aisha Raziallahu Anha
has a husband she was still not granted a child and Hadhrat Maryam Alaihissalam
was granted a child without a husband. Hadhrat Yaqoob Alaihissalam would
place his hand on his head daily but his eyesight was not restored but Hadhrat
Yusuf's Alaihissalam shirt just touched him and his eyesight returned.
The same wind which would lift and carry the throne of Hadhrat Sulaimaan Alaihissalam
was not ordered to transport Nabi Alaihissalam
in a few seconds to Madinah during hijrat.(Although we know how dangerous hijrat
journey was indeed). Hadhrat Sulaimaan Alaihissalam is a Nabi. but the transporting of
Bilqecs's throne is the karaamat of his companion Jinn (Not of him).
This is also by Allaah's decision, if he wishes then even thousands of miles
away, Baitul Muqaddas will be visible. Jannat and Jahannam
will be visible. On the contrary if he does not wish then from a few miles away
a false report of the martyrdom of Hadhrat Uthmaan Raziallahu Anhu will
come and Nabi Salllallahu Alaihi wasallam will begin to take ba'it-
allegiance. When Allah does not wish then Hadhral Yusuf Alaihissalam
will be in the well of Kan'aan yet Hadhrat Yaqoob Alaihissalam will be
unaware and if Allah wishes then he will let him perceive the fragrance of
Hadhrat Yusufs Alaihissalam shirt all the way from Egypt. I then said to
him "You, who are calling the entire world mushrik, re-think your stance
and repent."
(After this a very interesting Q&A on the
famous masaa'il of salaat and tahaarat takes place. This is not related to our
topic so I will not relate it, the end of his treatise is with regards to the
topic. that will now be related -Abdullaah)
One
contradiction
Waheed Sahib said "In 'Stories of the Sahabah'
Hadhrat Sheikhul Hadeeth has made two conflicting statements. On page 37 he
writes that Hadhrat Hanzalah Raziallahu Anhu has said 'When we are with
our wives and children then the same feeling does not remain that was present
when we were in the blessed company of Nabi That is why I fear nifaaq
(hypocrisy) "and on page 79 he writes "Hadhrat Hanzalah Raziallahu
Anhu was newly wed and without performing ghusal he went out into jihad and
was martyred. The angels then performed his ghusal. Whereas previously it was
stated that he had children with whom he would get preoccupied and thus fear
nifaaq (Hypocrisy). It is because of these conflicting reports that educated
people dislike this kitaab."
I replied
"Alhamdulillaah the educated world are coming closer to Islam
through the help of this book. Undoubtedly the cure for ignorance and
stubbornness no one has. That story in which Hadhrat Hanzalah Raziallahu
Anhu showed fears of nifaaq is about Hanzalah bin Rabee'a Raziallahu
Anhu the scribe of wahi (Divine message from Allah) for Nabi Salllallahu
Alaihi wasallam and that Hadhrat Hanzalah Raziallahu Anhu who the
angels gave ghusal to is Hanzalah bin Maalik Raziallahu Anhu. This explanation is given with reference to Mirqaat'
the sub-notes of 'Mishkaat' page l97 volume 6.
When Waheed Beig was shown this he became very
upset and was making toubah repeatedly, he said "I used this objection
frequently and caused much trouble to many people, now I learn it was due to my
lack of knowledge, Allaah Ta'ala forgive me."
Drinking Blood
Waheed Sahib said "Blood is haraam, this is
proven by the Quraan but Hadhrat Sheikhul Hadeeth sahib has narrated stories of
two sahaabah Raziallahu Anhu drinking blood of Nabi (Prophet) Salllallahu
Alaihi wasallam. He even learnt of it yet expressed no anger at them but
rather said "He in whose blood my blood is mixed, the fire of Jahannam
will not touch him." Can Allaah's Nabi Salllallahu Alaihi wasallam
oppose the Quraan?(Nauzubillah).
I replied
"One of these stories is regarding the father of Hadhrat Abu Saeed Khudri
Hadhrat Maalik bin Sinaan Salllallahu Alaihi wasallam. Hafiz Ibn Hajar Rahimullah
has mentioned it in 'AI-Iaabah' (volume 3 page 346) and Ibni Abdul Bar
Rahimullah in 'Al-Isaabah' (volume 3
page 370). So now will you include these two huffaaz in your allegation as
well?
Secondly Hadhrat Maalik bin Sinaan Raziallahu
Anhu was martyred in Uhud
('Al-Istie'aab'). Amongst those who were martyred in Uhud are also those who
had Objection consumed wine as wine had not yet been made haraam. Can you prove that blood i.e. flowing
blood had been made haraam before Uhud? Imaam Qurthubi in his tafseer (vol 2 p
216) slates thal the aayat regarding flowing blood was revealed during the
Hajjatul-Widaa on the day of Arafah. Until you cannot prove, with substantial
evidence, that it was made haraam before Uhud, your allegation is baseless. To
think the best of Nabi Sallallahu Alaihi wasallam and the Sahabah Kiraam
Raziallahu Anhu is compulsory, that is why if we read of any Sahabi
drinking wine. we will immediateJy take it to be before it was made haraam. If
we hear that any Sahabi committed 'mut'aa'(contractual marriage).we will take
it to be before it was made haraam. In the same way, drinking blood and Nabi Salllallahu
Alaihi wasallam not reprimanding
them will be taken to be before it was made haraam. The second story is
regarding Hadhrat Abdullah bin Zubair
Hadhral Abdullah bin Zubair Raziallahu Anhu was nine years old when Nabi Salllallahu Alaihi wasallam
passed away. This story is also narrated by Hafiz Ibn Hajar ('Al Isaabah' vol2
p31O). So is Hafiz Ibn Hajar also included in this allegation or not? Hadhrat
Abdullaah bin Zubair Raziallahu Anhu did this in his childhood, so now
if this was before it was made haraam then there is no objection and if it was
after, then in this sentence Nabi Salllallahu Alaihi wasallam has
reprimanded him "He in whose body my blood is present the fire will not touch him but you will be destroyed
by people and you will destroy them."
Waheed
Sahib! These objections are not based on
any Ilmi foundation but rather just to contradict. Look! Hanafis say if the
Imam is impure and performed the salaat without ghusal or if the Imam performed
the salaat without wudhu then the salaat of the muqtadies (followers) is not
valid. Allamah Waheeduz zaman just to contradict this says" if the Imaam
performs the salaat in janaabat-state of major impurity- or without wudhu then
it is not necessary for the muqtadies to repet their salaat." ('Nuzulul
Abraar vol I p 1O1)
Ahle-sunnat say that a Muslims salaat is not valid
behind a kaafir but Waheeduz Zamaan sahib says it is valid. ('Nuzulul Abraar
vol)
Excrement
Waheed Sahib said "Hadhrat Sheikhul Hadeeth has written that Nabi's Salllallahu
Alaihi wasallam excrement, urine, excreta etc are all paak." I replied
"Excrement means left over waste. The stomach digests the food; the
actual nutrients are absorbed by the liver, while the remaining waste turns
into excreta and is released. This is the excrement of the stomach. The liver
then creates blood and sends it to the heart; the remaining waste is turned in
to urine and released. This is the excrement of the liver. The blood then
produces moisture in the veins, whatever excrement remains turns into sweat and
is released in the pores. Whatever blood formed into a part of the body or
turned into meat. The excrement is released from the pores as dirt. is obvious
that flies sit on everyone but no fly sat on the blessed body of Nabi Salllallahu
Alaihi wasallam. This is also an undeniable fact that everyone's sweat has
a stench but the sweat of Nabi Salllallahu Alaihi wasallam puts the world's best perfumes to shame.
Rasulullah's Salllallahu Alaihi wasallam sleep was also called sleep but
his sleep was better then our consciousness a thousand times. Nabi's Salllallahu
Alaihi wasallam dreams were revelation as well. Nabi's Salllallahu
Alaihi wasallam wudhu would not break when his slept. Similarly
Rasulullaah's Salllallahu Alaihi wasallam blessed perspiration was also
called perspiration but who said that Rasulullaah's Salllallahu Alaihi
wasallam perspiration should be taken as every common man's.
For him it was just perspiration but for his
devotees it is the finest perfume.
After oil is extracted from almonds the excrement
waste that remains is definitely the almond's excrement but if a cottonseed
says it is the same as mine then no sane person will accept this.
Most
definitely Rasulullaah Salllallahu Alaihi wasallam was human but why should
one deny those special attributes which Allaah Ta'ala had granted him? A ruby is a stone and the Hajar-Aswad is also a
stone but where can a ruby compete with it? The Hajar-Aswad has come from
Jannat. Allaah Ta'ala has kept special characteristics of Jannat within the
pure and blessed bodies of the Ambiyaa Alaihissalam. That is why the
perspiration of their pure bodies has been made as fragrant as the perspiration
of Jannat. Likewise if the outer
excrements have the special characteristic of purity, what objection can there
be?
What was
the result?
Waheed Sahib recorded everything I said and left.
He returned after two days and said "like how they could not present the
required ahaadeeth, (i.e. such a hadeeth that states when behind the Imam to
read anyone of 113 surahs is haraam but to read Surah Fatihah is fardh or a
hadeeth that states one should lift his hands in salaat in 10 different places
and he should not lift it in 11 places, on condition that either Allaah or his
Rasul must say it is sahee, as besides AlIaah and His Rasul no ones word is
proof. These ahaadeeth were requested with the reward of one million Rupees per
hadeeth.
Those wrong references that the author of 'Haqeeqatul
Fiqh' gave from 'Hidaayah' could not be found in the Arabic 'Hidaayah'
and the wrong references made by the author of 'Salaatur Rasul could not be
found in the 'Sihaah Sittah'. Neither did they have any answer for the
dhaeef ahaadeeth that the author used not only in fazaail but in ahkaam as
well.
I have complete confidence that this group has no
real principal; their foundation is only based on contradicting the Ahle-Sunnah
wal Jama'ah. Those masa'il that you have explained are clear proof of there
contradiction.
I admit my mistake that I left those whose way and
manners were according to the Sunnat of Nabi Salllallahu Alaihi wasallam
who were blessed with the wealth of fear
of Allaah, who differentiate between halaal and haram and whose worry day and
night is how the way of Nabi Salllallahu Alaihi wasallam can come alive in
this world. Instead I followd those youngsters who have no other work but to
talk ill of the bastions of Islaam, create suspicions about them and create
hatred for the senior authorities of Islaam. I now repent with a sincere heart,
Alhamdullilaah I will remain Hanafi one of the maslak of haqq of the AhleSunnah
wal Jama'ah. I will remain fully aware of those who spread suspicion about
it and will inform others as well. May Allaah Ta'ala keep me firm on the truth
and protect me from the evil of those who create suspicion regarding Deen. Aameen
ya Rabbal Aalameen.
